SUMMARY ON DATA COLLECTION AND REPOSITORIES
SUMMARY
ON DATA COLLECTION AND REPOSITORIES
Data collection and repositories are central components
of effective research data management (RDM), ensuring that data is not only
generated systematically but also preserved and made accessible for future use.
Data collection refers to the structured process of
gathering information through methods such as surveys, interviews, observations,
or document analysis. In RDM, emphasis is placed on producing high-quality, reliable,
and well-documented data. This includes the use of standardised procedures and
tools, as well as the creation of metadata that describes the content, methodology,
and structure of the data. Proper documentation enhances data integrity and
enables reuse, which aligns with the FAIR principles ensuring that data is
findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (Wilkison et...al., 2016).
The Digital Curation Centre (DCC) Lifecycle Model
highlights data collection within the “create or receive” stage, emphasizing
that data should be captured in formats and structures that support long-term
preservation and usability (Higgins, 2008). Poor data collection practices such
as of documentation or inconsistent format can compromise the entire data
lifecycle, limiting the value of research outputs. Therefore, researchers are
encountered to adopt best practices at the point of data creation, including
ethical considerations, data quality checks, and adherence to institutional or
disciplinary standards.
Data repositories compliment data collection by
providing secure platforms for storing, preserving, and sharing research data. These
repositories may be institutional, disciplinary, or general-purpose, and they
play a critical role in ensuring long-term access and visibility of research
outputs. Modern repositories support functionalities such as persistent
identifiers for example, DOIs, metadata standards, version control, and access
management. According to Tenopir, et...al., (2020), the use of repositories has
increased globally, driven by funder requirements and the growing emphasis on
open science, although challenges such as lack of skills and infrastructure
persist, particularly in developing regions.
Repositories also align with the preservation and
access stages of the DCC lifecycle, ensuring that data remains usable over time
despite technological changes. However, in many African institutions, including
those in Malawi, the adoption of repositories is constrained by limited
infrastructure, insufficient policies, and low awareness among researchers
(Chiware & Mathe, 2016). Addressing these challenges requires institutional
investment in repository systems, staff training, and the development of clear
RDM policies.
In a nut shell, effective data collection ensures the
generation of high-quality, well documented data, while repositories ensure
that data is preserved, accessible, and reusable over time. Both components are
interdependent and central to robust research data management systems.
References
Chiware, E.R.T.,
& Mathe, Z. (2016). Academic libraries’ role in research data management
services: A South
African perspective. South Africa journal of Libraries and information
Science. 82(2),1-9.
https://doi.org/10.7553/82-2-1561
Higgins, S.
(2009). The DCC Curation Lifecycle Model. International journal of Digital
Curation, 3(1), 134-#140. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.48
Tenopir, C., Allard, S.,
Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, A. U., Wu, L., Read, E., Manoff, M., & Frame,
M. (2011). Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions.
PLoS ONE, 6(6),
e21101.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier,
M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A.,
Blomberg, N., Boiten, J. W., da Silva Santos,
L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J.,
Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo,
I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T.,
Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR
guiding principles for scientific data
management
and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Well Done
ReplyDeleteGreat work
ReplyDeleteWell articulated
ReplyDelete