A SUMMARY ON SELECTION AND APPRAISAL OF DATA
A
SUMMARY ON SELECTION AND APPRAISAL OF DATA
Selection and appraisal of data are important
activities in research data management and digital curation, because they help
institutions to identify, preserve, and provide access to variable and reliable
research information for future use. In digital curation, selection involves
determining which datasets, digital records, or research materials should be
retained, while appraisal refers to evaluating their long-term significance
based on factors such as research value, originality, authenticity, legal
requirements, ethical issues, and potential for reuse (Higgins, 2008).
The continuous increase in digital research output,
big data, and open science practices has made effective appraisal procedures
more necessary in libraries, archives, and research institutions. Cox et...al.
(2019) note that academic libraries are increasingly expected to support
researchers throughout the research data lifecycle, including during the
selection and appraisal stages. Proper appraisal enables institutions to
minimise unnecessary storage costs, avoid duplication of data, and focus
preservation effort on datasets that are considered valuable for future
research and institutional purposes. In additions, the FAIR principles which are;
Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable play an importable role in
guiding data selection because they promote data sharing, accessibility, and
long-term usability in research environment (Wilkison, et...al., 2016).
Metadata creation is also essential in the appraisal
process because it helps librarians and information professionals assess the
origin, reliability, context, and usability of datasets before making
preservation decisions (Johnston et...al., 2018). Furthermore, ethical and
legal concerns are significant during appraisal, especially when research data
contain confidential or sensitive information. Information professionals must
therefore balance the need for open access with the protection of privacy and
intellectual property rights (Johnston et...al., 2018). The advancement of
artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies has also influenced
appraisal practices by supporting automated classification and analysis of
large volumes of digital records.
However, Acker and Kriesberg (2021) argue that
professional human judgement remains essential because appraisal often requires
contextual interpretation and ethical decision-making that automated systems
can not fully provide. Collaborative appraisal has also become increasingly
important in digital curation, as librarians, archivists, researchers, and
information technology specialists work together to determine the long-term
value of research data. Yoon and Schultz (2017) explain that such collaboration
strengthens data stewardship and promote sustainable digital preservation
practices within institutions. Moreover, appraisal decisions influence
preservation planning because they determine which datasets will continue to receive
institutional support for storage, migration, and long-term maintenance.
Therefore, selection and appraisal of data remain central to digital curation
and research data management as they promote the preservation of trustworthy
and reusable research information, support research integrity, encourage open
science, and ensure effective use of institutional resources in managing
digital data.
References
Acker, A., & Kriesberg, A. (2021). Practical
appraisal of digital records: A review of challenges
and emerging approaches in digital curation. Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies,
8(1), 1–15.
Cox, A. M., Kennan, M. A., Lyon, L., & Pinfield, S.
(2019). Developments in research data
management in academic libraries: Towards an
understanding of research data service
maturity. Journal of the Association for
Information Science and Technology, 70(9), 1–
14.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24171
Higgins, S. (2008). The DCC curation lifecycle model. International
Journal of Digital
Curation, 3(1),
134–140. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.48
Johnston, L. R., Carlson, J., Hswe, P., &
Hudson-Vitale, C. (2018). Data curation network: How
do we compare? A snapshot of current data
curation services. Journal of eScience
Librarianship, 7(1),
Article e1122. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2018.1122
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J.,
Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A.,
Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos,
L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J.,
Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo,
I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T.,
Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR
guiding principles for scientific data
management and stewardship. Scientific
Data, 3, Article 160018.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Yoon, A., & Schultz, T. (2017). Research data
management services in academic libraries in the
US: A content analysis of libraries’ websites.
College & Research Libraries, 78(7), 920–
933. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.7.920
Well summarised!
ReplyDeleteGreat
ReplyDeleteGreat
ReplyDeleteGreat work Edna, keep it up
ReplyDeleteBeautiful work
ReplyDelete